Thursday, June 4, 2009

The past several years ive been observing the relative tolerances for pain of my grandmothers, Betsy and LaVerne. One of them appears has a very high tolerance while the other has a very low tolerance for pain. Betsy is seemingly not bothered by complicated and intrusive surgeries, while LaVerne complains greatly over something as common as a sliver. The idea of gaining higher tolerance for pain through painful experiences is thwarted by the fact that they both have had many of the same injuries and surgeries and have gone through childbirth many times, so what is the difference between them? Maybe Betsy is just less likely to make her pain known than LaVerne. Afterall, nobody likes a whiner. Maybe there is some difference physically. To gain insight into this, I have devised an experiment (hypothetically of course).

The goal of the experiment is to determine whether Betsy truly is more tolerant to pain than LaVerne. A small electrode will be attached to the tip of each subject’s nose. Electrical pulses will be sent through the electrode and into the nose in intervals, starting with no power and increasing gradually. The subject will be given a stop button that will turn the power to the electrode off and instructed to only press the button when they experience pain. I believe that LaVerne will press the stop button at a lower level of power than Betsy.

A possible problem with this, aside from the fact that I doubt that either of them would agree to participate, is that this would not distinguish whether the difference is in the nerves in the nose, or if it is something in the brain that causes one to be more tolerant than the other. Also, it does not account for temporary desensitization. Future studies could focus on the location of the differences or use different stimuli on different parts of the body.

4 comments:

  1. I have been here thinking about an ethical way to measure the pain threshold of human beings. I think it is interesting that you would have your grandmothers participate in such a study. I think it is funny more than anything else. If it were two men it would probably turn into a match of wills and testosterone levels. I think that this match of wills might actually taint the true threshold because of someone's sheer will.
    I believe that if you were to set up such a study you could find volunteers but i think the tricky part ethically would be the method in which you used. electrical impulses is a great idea because you could measure the voltage quite accurately and it would not damage the flesh of the participant at lower levels.I am not an expert at voltage and the extent at which it can damage a human but of all the methods i have thought about this one seems the most plausible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh yes im sure that things like this might turn into a battle of wills, especially with men trying to prove their masculinity. How the ability to hide pain has anything to do with manliness is beyond me; both of the participants in such a battle would probably end up even more brain damaged than they started.

    ReplyDelete
  3. maybe peoples aren't trying to hide there pain. some people might have more tolerance to pain, because as a child they got hurt a lot from running around and being active.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I tihnk it depends on the person as stated above. I have two kids my younger son broke his arm at the growth plate of his elbow and didnt even cry. My oldest son he cries if he gets hit in the arm with a baseball so honestly it all depends on the person I believe

    ReplyDelete